Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and Human Choices, 29 (2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The place of attachment during the peoples mating. Report about General Mindset, 4 (2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Web sites paradox reviewed. Record of Societal Items, 58 (1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites contradiction: A social technology you to definitely decrease social wedding and you may psychological really-being? American Psychologist, 53 (9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.Yards., & Areas, J. Meters. (2001). Number, timing, and you may duration of marriage ceremonies and divorces. Newest Populace Accounts, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional analysis off closeness, passion, and you will union: Review this new presumptions of your own triangular idea regarding like. Emotional Profile, 90 (step three,Pt1), 1009—1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step 3.1009—1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, CharmDate dating site anmeldelse Age. (2004). Feeling finest about starting tough: Social reviews inside personal relationship. Diary away from Personality and you will Public Therapy, 87 (1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: Brand new implicit knowledge from personal rivalry. Log off Character and you may Public Therapy, 97 (1), 74–87.

An effective. (2001) mitment and relationship repair components

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to glamorous solutions: New progressed psychology away from relationships fix. Evolution and you will Human Choices, 29 (5), 343–349.

pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential research regarding conflict and you may agreement when you look at the disturb and you can nondistressed relationship lovers. Record out-of Asking and you will Health-related Psychology, 49 (4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Green, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationship development on the web: What is the large appeal? Journal out-of Societal Situations, 58 (1), 9–30.

The key benefits of positive illusions: Idealization in addition to design of pleasure within the personal relationships

Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-evaluation intentions into the romantic relationship: A style of internationally improvement and you will specific verification. In the P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Facts ents regarding the examination of couple communication (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College or university Drive.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-specialist thread from the lens of connection principle. Psychotherapy: Principle, Search, Habit, Degree, 45 (4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The new societal overseeing system: Improved sensitiveness to societal cues as the an adaptive reaction to societal exception. In the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh new personal outcast: Ostracism, public difference, getting rejected, and bullying (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Mindset Press.

Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Global and you may particular relational habits on the contact with personal connections. Journal out-of Personality and you can Societal Psychology, 80 (4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you will advice seeking from inside the personal relationship. Identity and you may Personal Psychology Bulletin, 33 (3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and certain accessory representations from inside the adulthood: Could there be a romance?. Journal Off Personal And personal Dating, 18 (6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Inside the J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Close close relationship: Maintenance and improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An excellent. D. (2000). Projection individually impression certainly spouses since a purpose of this new similarity within their shared event. Character And Societal Psychology Bulletin, 26 (8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience out-of extrinsic advantages towards the taste and enjoying. Diary away from Identification and you may Societal Mindset, 38 (3), 453–460.